<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<acquisitions>
<acquisition>
<global_id>temporary--row-0--20200226100927-652711</global_id>
<name>ST103</name>
<device/>
<technique/>
<operator/>
<sample_global_id>20180305113432-690138</sample_global_id>
<sample_name>ST103</sample_name>
<description/>
<chemistries>
<analysis>
<nickname>SiO2</nickname>
<value>52.32</value>
<unit>%</unit>
<uncertainty/>
<label/>
<info/>
</analysis>
<analysis>
<nickname>TiO2</nickname>
<value>0.77</value>
<unit>%</unit>
<uncertainty/>
<label/>
<info/>
</analysis>
<analysis>
<nickname>Al2O3</nickname>
<value>17.03</value>
<unit>%</unit>
<uncertainty/>
<label/>
<info/>
</analysis>
<analysis>
<nickname>Fe2O3</nickname>
<value>8.08</value>
<unit>%</unit>
<uncertainty/>
<label/>
<info/>
</analysis>
<analysis>
<nickname>MnO</nickname>
<value>0.15</value>
<unit>%</unit>
<uncertainty/>
<label/>
<info/>
</analysis>
<analysis>
<nickname>MgO</nickname>
<value>7.0</value>
<unit>%</unit>
<uncertainty/>
<label/>
<info/>
</analysis>
<analysis>
<nickname>CaO</nickname>
<value>10.95</value>
<unit>%</unit>
<uncertainty/>
<label/>
<info/>
</analysis>
<analysis>
<nickname>Na2O</nickname>
<value>2.34</value>
<unit>%</unit>
<uncertainty/>
<label/>
<info/>
</analysis>
<analysis>
<nickname>K2O</nickname>
<value>1.8</value>
<unit>%</unit>
<uncertainty/>
<label/>
<info/>
</analysis>
<analysis>
<nickname>P2O5</nickname>
<value>0.27</value>
<unit>%</unit>
<uncertainty/>
<label/>
<info/>
</analysis>
<analysis>
<nickname>LOI</nickname>
<value>-0.23</value>
<unit>%</unit>
<uncertainty/>
<label/>
<info/>
</analysis>
<analysis>
<nickname>total</nickname>
<value>100.48</value>
<unit>%</unit>
<uncertainty/>
<label/>
<info/>
</analysis>
</chemistries>
</acquisition>
</acquisitions>
The table is created from analysis shown below. The rowname major (Schiavi et al., 2012) filters out analysis. Upper analysis has priority.To list more analysis, add a stone in stone sub-tab.