Guo et al. (2009) Mineralogical and geochemical constraints on magmatic evolution of Paleocene adakitic andesites from the Yanji area, NE China, Lithos, 112, 321-341, doi:10.1016/j.lithos.2009.03.017. < 20100403102547580.admin > pub
Appended Table 2 Representative electron microprobe analyses of plagiolcase in the amphibole andesites in the Yanji area < 20200123114708-343622 > pub
measured unit 20YJ-134-Pl-1_rim 20YJ-134-Pl-2_rim 20YJ-134-Pl-3_mantle 20YJ-134-Pl-4_mantle 20YJ-134-Pl-5_mantle 20YJ-134-Pl-6_core 20YJ-134-Pl-7_core 20YJ-134-Pl-8_mantle 20YJ-134-Pl-9_mantle 20YJ-134-Pl-10_rim 20YJ-134-Pl-11_rim 20YJ-134-Pl-12_groundmass 20YJ-134-Pl-13_groundmass 20YJ-134-Pl-14_groundmass 20YJ-134-Pl-15_groundmass 20YJ-139-Pl-16 20YJ-139-Pl-17
[SiO2] a cg/g 54.78 53.71 56.26 55.65 54.51 58.44 58.58 55.64 57.62 55.23 55.78 53.46 54.87 53.79 55.43 57.44 58.31
[TiO2] a cg/g 0.02 0.03 0.01 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.0 0.01 0.01 0.05 0.0 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01 0.04 0.06
[Al2O3] a cg/g 28.83 28.99 27.03 27.78 28.58 25.36 26.46 28.21 26.61 28.01 28.01 28.57 27.88 28.17 27.61 25.73 26.22
[FeOT] a cg/g 0.31 0.25 0.18 0.22 0.2 0.15 0.12 0.17 0.19 0.26 0.37 0.32 0.29 0.3 0.38 0.54 0.52
[MgO] a cg/g 0.02 0.03 0.0 0.01 0.02 0.02 0.01 0.0 0.0 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.05 0.02 0.06 0.07 0.06
[CaO] a cg/g 11.77 11.52 9.44 11.02 11.63 7.64 8.72 11.18 9.34 10.77 10.95 11.46 10.93 11.68 11.21 7.98 8.92
[Na2O] a cg/g 4.32 4.89 6.19 5.05 4.55 7.62 6.26 4.83 5.98 4.95 4.91 4.94 5.2 4.81 5.2 7.2 6.81
[K2O] a cg/g 0.13 0.16 0.25 0.16 0.12 0.33 0.23 0.14 0.18 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.12 0.12 0.15 0.59 0.48
total a cg/g 100.17 99.57 99.35 99.9 99.62 99.57 100.36 100.17 99.93 99.46 100.21 98.94 99.38 98.92 100.06 99.59 101.39
PlAn a cg/g 59.6 56.0 45.1 54.1 58.2 35.0 42.9 55.7 45.8 54.1 54.7 55.8 53.3 56.9 53.9 36.7 40.9
PlAb a cg/g 39.6 43.0 53.5 44.9 41.1 63.2 55.7 43.5 53.1 44.9 44.4 43.5 46.0 42.4 45.2 60.0 56.5
PlOr a cg/g 0.8 0.9 1.4 1.0 0.7 1.8 1.4 0.8 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.9 3.2 2.6
(a) determined by EPMA on EPMA
name physical-form quantity unit global-id
20YJ-134-Pl-1_rim pub 20200123113411-027772
20YJ-134-Pl-2_rim pub 20200123113411-052694
20YJ-134-Pl-3_mantle pub 20200123113411-785659
20YJ-134-Pl-4_mantle pub 20200123113411-123321
20YJ-134-Pl-5_mantle pub 20200123113411-522896
20YJ-134-Pl-6_core pub 20200123113411-004259
20YJ-134-Pl-7_core pub 20200123113411-490230
20YJ-134-Pl-8_mantle pub 20200123113411-342116
20YJ-134-Pl-9_mantle pub 20200123113411-290454
20YJ-134-Pl-10_rim pub 20200123113411-716734
20YJ-134-Pl-11_rim pub 20200123113411-752429
20YJ-134-Pl-12_groundmass pub 20200123113904-443276
20YJ-134-Pl-13_groundmass pub 20200123113904-323998
20YJ-134-Pl-14_groundmass pub 20200123113904-531968
20YJ-134-Pl-15_groundmass pub 20200123113904-180350
20YJ-139-Pl-16 pub 20200123114128-165745
20YJ-139-Pl-17 pub 20200123114128-670899

The table is created from analysis shown below. The rowname major_Pl (Guo et al., 2009) filters out analysis. Upper analysis has priority.To list more analysis, add a stone in stone sub-tab.

  • name
    technique
    device
    priority
20YJ-134-Pl-1_rim 20YJ-134-Pl-2_rim 20YJ-134-Pl-3_mantle 20YJ-134-Pl-4_mantle 20YJ-134-Pl-5_mantle 20YJ-134-Pl-6_core 20YJ-134-Pl-7_core 20YJ-134-Pl-8_mantle 20YJ-134-Pl-9_mantle 20YJ-134-Pl-10_rim 20YJ-134-Pl-11_rim 20YJ-134-Pl-12_groundmass 20YJ-134-Pl-13_groundmass 20YJ-134-Pl-14_groundmass 20YJ-134-Pl-15_groundmass 20YJ-139-Pl-16 20YJ-139-Pl-17